This is a typical video showing an aerodynamic trail.
They are not wing-prayers. Gatekeepers will ply you with misinformation about wing-sprayers to derail your understanding of what chemtrails are.
They are not made with secret chem-juice that comes from secret chem-juice containers, which are topped up by secret chem-juice employees, which then goes down secret chem-juice pipes inside the plane to be dispensed by the invisible-secret chem-juice nozzles on the wings of commercial airliners.
That does not happen; it is a figment of the gatekeeper’s imagination, and to trick everyone into following an easily proven lie.
Using the word “spraying” to describe chemtrails is a mistake, and it feeds into the wing-sprayer lie.
Everyone in the world sees the trails coming from ordinary engines, attached to ordinary airliners, on ordinary flights. There are millions of photos on the internet.
Chemtrails do not form from the wing edges. Aerodynamic trails do, and they are the only trails without chemical enhancement.
All of the images above show aerodynamic trails. Getting this wrong and calling them chemtrails is a mistake that undermines the credibility of anyone complaining about chemtrails. As you can see, this mistake is made in many places by people who should know better.
I have tried to explain the mistake to these people on their social media posts, but instead of listening to reason, I am blocked. This leads me to believe the deception is purposeful, and these social media posts are made to undermine people trying to learn.
Most chemtrail pages promote aerodynamic trails as chemtrails or wing-sprayers. Over the years, I have tried to explain this mistake to many of them. They are not listening because they are not about the truth; they are about confusing people who are learning about chemtrails, so that they go away with a false idea that can be easily disproved by the authorities and social media trolls.
If governments wanted to spray the people secretly, they would not make a spray that turned into a thick cloud; they would make one that remained as a vapour and was always invisible.
This article by the Royal Aeronautical Society is debunking chemtrails. Obviously, they are talking about aerodynamic trails, and not chemtrails, but not understanding properly is how we make ourselves vulnerable to ridicule like this.
The article does not mention fuel content; it debunks chemtrails because we are tricked into believing this silly lie about aerodynamic trails being left by wing-spraying chemtrail planes.
Aerodynamic trails form because of pressure changes made by the lift of the wing in saturated air that allow the water vapour to condense out into droplets.
There is no secret trick to it. It has nothing to do with chemtrails, and anyone claiming it does is either misinformed or purposefully deceiving.
The oldest reference I have found explaining how aerodynamic trails work is from 1981.
It is a USAF technical report for predicting contrails and references the original 1950s work.
It says, condensation trails (contrails) are elongated tubular-shaped clouds composed of water droplets or ice crystals which form behind aircraft when the wake becomes supersaturated with respect to water. Depending upon their origin, they are called either “aerodynamic” or “engine-exhaust” trails.
It continues to explain that aerodynamic trails are caused by the reduction in air pressure as the wing travels at high speed through supersaturated air. If enough liquid water is produced, a visible trail will form.
Science understands how they work.
Aerodynamic trails have been extensively studied since they were first discovered. The reality of them can never be denied.
Do not be confused with images of aerodynamic trails; unlike engine exhaust trails, they do not contain any chemicals.